Lucky for President Jacob Zuma and First Lady Nompumelelo Ntuli Zuma that the World Cup came along and shifted the country’s attention from the recent allegations of infidelity in the extended presidential household.
Or perhaps the timing of that remarkable letter (claiming that MaNtuli, as she is known, had had an affair with a bodyguard who then committed suicide) faxed to newsrooms around the country is auspicious. The eve of a big international event such as a World Cup is a choice time to embarrass the president if that was the intention and it’s possible that those behind the anonymous letter did not realise how the soccer jamboree would swamp SA’s media to the extent that it has.
This shouldn’t surprise us as all political leaders have enemies and Zuma would have more than most, given the bitter battle he waged and promises he made to get the top job. And of course, information is seldom leaked to journalists without an agenda. But this was all looking suspiciously like a smear campaign into which the press were suckered with abandon until it also started looking like it was true.
Though the mainstream press have found it hard to nail down independent corroboration of the allegations, I’m convinced after speaking to Eric Ndiyane – the editor and news editor of the KwaZulu-Natal isiZulu-language newspaper Ilanga that broke the story – that it is indeed true.
Ndiyane said the paper found three independent sources to corroborate the allegation that MaNtuli had an affair with bodyguard Phinda Thomo, who then allegedly took his own life after the affair was discovered. (If true, this puts the paternity of MaNtuli’s unborn child in doubt. Her pregnancy was confirmed recently.)
Like everybody else, Ilanga was faxed the letter on Monday, May 31, and it spent the next couple of days nailing down independent corroboration so that the paper could break the story on Thursday, June 3. Later on that day the Johannesburg-based national Sunday paper, City Press, took the unusual step (for City Press) of putting a story up on their website, which then forced everybody’s else hand. Except for the Mail & Guardian, almost everyone, his blog and his dog piled gleefully into the story, citing Ilanga though few had their own independent sources for the story or had probably even read the original in isiZulu.
This raises a number of interesting questions about journalism in South Africa. Was it irresponsible for those to publish the allegations on the say-so of someone else? Can the president’s wives expect some measure of privacy? Was it necessary to name the bodyguard? While you can’t defame the dead, the hurt caused to his family would have been great but, on the other hand, what kind of privacy can a presidential bodyguard expect if he is allegedly caught having an affair with one of the first ladies?
Having spoken to Ndiyane, City Press editor Ferial Haffajee and Mail & Guardian editor Nic Dawes about how they covered the story, I can say the decision to publish was not taken lightly at any of these newspapers… CLICK HERE TO READ THE REST OF THIS COLUMN, CALLED “BACKSTORY”, AT WITS UNIVERSITY’S JOURNALISM.CO.ZA
Popularity: 6% [?]









Loading...