Naspers, the R115-billion media company that owns the Daily Sun, Rapport, Beeld and Die Burger, released excellent interim results last week, driven largely by growth in its pay-TV operations such as DSTV in South Africa and digital businesses in emerging markets across the world such as in China, Russia, Eastern Europe and Latin America.
Revenue for the six months ending September 2009 was up by 6% to R13.5 compared with the comparable period in 2008. Core headline earnings were 37% higher at R2.4bn. Not too shoddy for the middle of a recession!
Grubstreet spoke to the company’s CEO, Koos Bekker, about its digital businesses and the star performer Tencent, the Chinese internet services firm, that contributed R1.1-billion to the group’s R4.1-billion consolidated profit – a 49% increase from the same period in 2008.
GILL MOODIE: From the interim results, we can see that Naspers internet revenue is up from 21% in the last financial year to 23% (for the half year ending September 2009), driven by this fantastic growth of Tencent in China. Do you expect this to become an ever increasing slice of the pie?
KOOS BEKKER: Gill, you know the internet moves fast. You could be surprised. But there are two things in China that I like. The one is that about 27% of the Chinese population is now online and that can probably go up to 70% or 80%. If you look at South Korea, it’s at 80% so the sheer number of warm bodies on the internet will increase. But secondly, at the same, the amount of money that people devote to the internet increases month by month… goes up so the effect of both elements is actually quite noticeable on top line, where not only Tencent but several internet service in China are growing quite well. And I think growth can continue as far as we can see.
GILL MOODIE: What fascinate me about Tencent is that we really don’t have anything like it in the English-speaking internet world that I know of. Tencent really is an ecosystem. If you’re there, there’s no need to go elsewhere on the net.
KOOS BEKKER: “Ecosystem” is a very good word for Tencent. If you look at its strengths, its strongest point is that it’s a communications system with instant messaging. Add to that, it’s the biggest internet portal in China. Then it’s the biggest games platform in China. The Chinese play games mainly to socialise; not to beat the machine or to bash each other’s heads in. It’s mainly to meet people. (Tencent) also has a very wide social network system.
Where it’s weak, it has very limited search capability. It’s also by far the number two (in China) in terms of e-commerce. So on search, it’s a distant third and on e-commerce a distant second and the other areas it’s quite strong in.
GILL MOODIE: I’ve read that international analysts expect the growth of Tencent to slow in the next three to five years because gaming is becoming increasing competitive and games was a big driver of Tencent’s growth recently. What’s your view on this?
KOOS BEKKER: Tencent is not reliant on one technology. When we invested almost 10 years ago, Tencent had only instant-messaging services so initially they had no income. So the initial income was when people paid to do instant messaging – not between PC and PC, which was free, but PC to cellphone – and then it went into portals and it started getting some advertising income. Then it went into e-commerce and then and then and then. So Tencent, using your term, is a fairly complex, diversified ecosystem and should people play fewer games, they will do something else on the web. You know, they’ll socialise more. Well, Tencent has the biggest social network in China. Or maybe they’ll interact with each other in the blogging set-up or maybe there’s a new kind of Twitter activity. Who know? It doesn’t really matter.
Tencent now employs almost 11 000 people and last year alone it appointed 400 new engineers so it’s an enormously hard-working, very tech-savvy outfit. And, consequently, if something new develops on the internet, they have a chance of adapting and using it for themselves.
GILL MOODIE: Koos, you’ve said before that when it comes to Naspers’ foreign ownerships of companies that you’re happy to leave the local managers to do their thing. But Tencent and Mail.ru in Russia (an email and social networking firm), for instance, are large potatoes now. Will you continue in this vein when there’s so much more at stake?
KOOS BEKKER: You see, the management team at Tencent is really extraordinary. It’s one of the best management teams anywhere in the world in the internet. And they are close to their market, they understand the culture. We can’t do it half as well as they can so we’re very happy to sit on the board, sit on the committees and play our role and we sometimes discuss things with them but they run the show. We have the same with Mail.ru, where we have about 40% (shareholding). We try to find very good local management and we follow them and support them for years. When we started with Tencent, it had 30 employees. It was making a loss. So you stick with a team and over time a certain loyalty develops and you learn the trade. We tend to be patient long-term investors. We’re not there for the quick killing.
GILL MOODIE: Did you ever think Tencent would become this big, when you first bought into it?
KOOS BEKKER: You know, some things you can predict in life but one of the most difficult is market size. When we started with MTN in 1991/1992, our business plan showed 300 000 subscribers… Today, what does MTN have? Fifteen million or whatever. It’s very difficult to judge market size simply because what is a luxury to one generation is a necessity to the next.
When cellphones started in this country, I envisaged it would be businesspeople or maybe the wife of a fairly wealthy professional person would have one but certainly I didn’t imagine that his kids would be running around with cellphones in the school playground. Even farmers have sheep herders on cellphones. So the internet will pervade the whole of society. It will penetrate all disciplines of life and Tencent wants to get a slice of that action and so do Mail.ru.
GILL MOODIE: You told Bloomberg after the release of the interims that you guys are looking at potential acquisitions in Malaysia and Indonesia. But there’s also been speculation recently about buying ICQ from AOL and buying Astrum (games developer) in Russia. Can you say anything about this?
KOOS BEKKER: Yes. Mail.ru is talking to Astrum in Russia. They’re still awaiting some (regulatory) approval but there’s an active negotiation going on. Astrum provides games and so Mail is interested in Astrum as Mail has some games but it’s still relatively weak. It has seen how well Tencent is doing with games so it’s keen to strengthen itself so there’s much substance to that story and we hope that the clearances will be received this week. The whole ICQ thing is just pure speculation. We haven’t talked to them. There’s some similarity to our business but the problem is – not that I’m a big expert in ICQ – but they have big businesses in the US and Germany that, frankly, don’t interest us at all.
GILL MOODIE: And Indonesia and Malaysia?
KOOS BEKKER: We’re very interested there. We are interested only in the emerging markets. We’d probably get killed in the US if we tried to compete with those powerful, well-funded, well-run Silicon Valley types. We used to have two gaps in the emerging markets. Latin America was very weak and southeast Asia was very weak.
We recently closed the BuscaPe deal (in Brazil), which gives us one of the two leading e-commerce players in that part of the world. But we’re still weak in southeast Asia. In particular, we look for good management teams and then we back them.
GILL MOODIE: Since you mentions the US, I’d really like to get your view on Rupert Murdoch’s latest moves, saying he wants paywalls for his newspapers’ websites and now that he’s talking to Bing (Microsoft’s search engine) to take payment for indexing and exclude Google. When someone with that amount of influence starts to change the game, does it have any effect on the internet players in the emerging markets?
KOOS BEKKER: We’d like Murdoch to succeed because there is a grave problem for newspapers worldwide. They generate content and pay journalists and incur legitimate expenses. But the ratio from your income at the moment from the internet to your print readers for a newspaper like the New York Times is about 10 to one. In other words, whatever your income is for a print reader – the price he pays you for the copy plus the advertising worth of his eyes – your income on the internet is about one-tenth of that.
So it just doesn’t make sense. If want democracy strengthened and promoted by people doing serious investigative work, someone needs to pay the bill and on the internet, no one is paying the bill. I really wish Murdoch would succeed in finding a way in getting payment. We’ve been in the internet since 1997 and it’s very hard to get payment. For example, the moment you ask someone to take their credit card out (on the net), you lose the vast majority of your readers. If you have 10, you lose nine of the 10.
GILL MOODIE: If you play in the digital space, especially transnationally like Naspers does, developments happen so fast and all over the world. How do you as a 50-something keep track of these developments. It’s hard for someone like me in their 30s, for instance, to keep up as it seems like such a young person’s game.
KOOS BEKKER: You know, the hard truth is that people of your age make things happen on the internet and people of my age are roadkill. There’s nothing you can do about that. Inventions on the internet are made by young people working terribly long hours, trying many things and most things fail. Only occasionally do things succeed and then it takes off like a wildfire. It’s a wonderful, interesting world.
Now, I’m too old to invent anything. All I can try to do is when I see a good entrepreneur, give him encouragement, sit with him and try to advise him when he faces business problems or when he wants to list, have a look at the company and maybe persuade them to wait a bit.
What makes for a good internet company is a mix of talent – the code writing and the inventions of the young people. Sometimes we can give them advice on business structure or issues where your judgment comes in but you have to be modest about your contribution.
GILL MOODIE: It’s very hard for us to tell from South Africa but who are Naspers’ competitors in the digital arena in emerging markets? Are they niche players or is there another Naspers out there?
KOOS BEKKER: Not in emerging markets. We’re by far the biggest. Europe is pretty useless but the centre of excellence in the internet is basically the West Coast of the US, all the way from Seattle right down to San Diego. Korea is a world leader in games. Japan leads in things connected to the cellphone. They are far ahead in anything to do with the internet and the cellphone. And then the Chinese are now the biggest internet market in the world and they’re becoming very good and very inventive.
So we’re the biggest in the emerging markets but we pale in comparison to the Googles and the other big American giants.
GILL MOODIE: Would you guys be interested in acquiring anything more in China then?
KOOS BEKKER: We can’t, because Tencent is active in several parts of the internet world and we don’t want to compete with Tencent. We can’t find anything in China that doesn’t conflict with Tencent.
Click here to see a handy diagram of Naspers’ company structure and here to download the latest interims (I’d recommend the analysts’ presentation and you will have problems with Firefox so rather use Internet Explorer).
Click here to read my Moneyweb column on the magic Tencent formula.
Popularity: 19% [?]




Just when you’ve got the hang of this, the boss (who, truth be told, probably doesn’t really know what a blog is) tells you you’ve got to learn how to use a digital camera, shoot interviews and then edit them into pithy two-minute packages in addition to your nailing down and writing the print story.
News24 also broke down the speech in manageable parcels quite quickly and their new design allows for a nice big pic of Zuma, which is what you want when you’ve got a big breaking story. The Times was a bit underwhelming and their pics gallery wasn’t half as comprehensive as the Sowetan’s — and then there’s that buffering business. Guys, until that Seacom cable is up and running, please downsize your multimedia. I’m working on a wireless network and even I have problems. Business Day is yet to get something up, which is disappointing as I thought their website revamp of the past two weeks might mean injecting some vooma into their breaking news content.







Loading...