“Was Mpshe’s Zuma decision plagiarised? The Hong Kong judge thinks
so!” (Grubstreet)
The James Myburgh piece that started all the trouble (Politicsweb)
“Double Standard or respect for the rule of law?” (Constitutionally
Speaking blog)
“NPA boss plagiarised judge in Zuma ruling”
“Mpshe: Zuma decision not an acquittal”
The full statement by Mokotedi Mpshe
“Shaik, Thint and the 16 charges” (The Times)
“Zuma charges: Mpshe to meet Surty” (IOL)
“Fact: Zuma has a case to answer” (Constitutionally Speaking)
“Why would the tapes save Zuma?” (Michael Trapido on Thought Leader)
Popularity: 4% [?]
Loading...