“Was Mpshe’s Zuma decision plagiarised? The Hong Kong judge thinks
http://grubstreet.co.za/2009/04/30/was-mpshes-zuma-decision-plagiarised-the-hong-kong-judge-thinks-so/
The James Myburgh piece that started all the trouble (Politicsweb)
“Double Standard or respect for the rule of law?” (Constitutionally Speaking blog)
http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974
“NPA defends Mpshe” (IOL)
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=nw20090416154009425C713094
“NPA boss plagiarised judge in Zuma ruling”
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=2996&art_id=vn20090415051139225C558094
The Democratic Alliance’s papers filed with the North Gauteng High Court for a judicial review of the decision by the NPA to withdraw all charges against Jacob Zuma
http://www.da.org.za/docs/7333/DA%20NPA%20NOTICE%20OF%20MOTION.pdf
“Mpshe: Zuma decision not an acquittal” (Mail & Guardian)
http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-04-06-mpshe-zuma-decision-not-an-acquittal
The full statement by Mokotedi Mpshe
http://www.friendsofjz.co.za/documents/NPA_Zumadecision.pdf
“Why would the tapes save Zuma?” (Michael Trapido on Thought Leader)
http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/traps/2009/03/30/why-would-the-tapes-save-zuma/
Popularity: 3% [?]
Loading...